BCP and DR templates with BIA, recovery procedures, and a standalone tabletop exercise kit.
Price
$79
One-time. No subscription. Use forever.
Delivered immediately after checkout — your template and guide links are emailed to you with your receipt.
Used by compliance teams at banks, fintechs, and asset managers
◆ Quick buying summary
◆ What's included
Use rights: customize for internal business use and use outputs with your auditors, customers, bank partners, and regulators. Do not resell or redistribute the template files.
◆ Preview
Business Impact Analysis framework — how to quantify RTO, RPO, and recovery priorities by business function
RTO classification tiers — Essential (4-24hrs), Important (24-72hrs), Deferred (72+ hrs) with recovery strategies
BCP risk assessment matrix — Impact × Likelihood with inherent vs. residual risk view
● Case file
These aren't theoretical scenarios. They happened to real companies in financial services within the last 36 months. They were expensive, public, and largely preventable with a tested BCP program — and they're exactly the kind of incidents your bank partner, examiner, and board will reference in your next review.
A faulty CrowdStrike Falcon Sensor update crashed ~8.5 million Windows devices on July 19, 2024 — airlines, hospitals, banks, retailers, government services. Recovery required physical access to each device to apply the manual fix.
Why it mattersSecurity tools became a single point of failure. Vendor concentration risk in endpoint protection wasn't on most BCPs. Manual recovery procedures and offline operating capability suddenly mattered.
Synapse — middleware connecting fintechs like Yotta, Juno, and Copper to sponsor banks (including Evolve) — filed Chapter 11 on April 22, 2024. The trustee discovered the ledger couldn't reconcile which customer was owed which dollars across partner banks.
Why it mattersCounterparty failure is a BCP event, not just a credit event. Your continuity plan needs to answer: what happens when our middleware partner files Chapter 11 and freezes the ledger?
Ransomware at a UnitedHealth subsidiary that processes healthcare claims cascaded across the industry. Pharmacies couldn't fill prescriptions for weeks. Attack detected February 21, 2024, attributed to the ALPHV/BlackCat ransomware gang.
Why it mattersRansomware doesn't have to hit you directly to take you down. Your BCP needs alternative-vendor activation playbooks pre-built — not improvised mid-incident when your critical vendor is offline.
If you're reading this trying to make sure your company doesn't end up on this list — you're in the right place. Here's what you'd recognize:
◆ Good fit if any of these sound familiar
Your bank partner just asked for a Business Continuity Plan with FFIEC-aligned documentation.
A real BCP isn't just a 10-page document — it's a BIA with RTO/RPO targets, dependency mapping, recovery procedures, tested tabletops, and an action item tracker. This kit gives you all of it, ready to populate.
Your last tabletop exercise was the day-of-incident — the actual incident.
Most fintechs discover their BCP gaps when something breaks. The Tabletop Exercise Kit + Case Study Walkthroughs let you find the gaps in 90 minutes of conference room time, not 8 hours of customer-facing chaos.
You're preparing for an OCC, FDIC, or state exam and BCM is on the checklist.
Examiners review BCP against the FFIEC BCM Handbook. The kit is built explicitly against those requirements — Section III.B (Risk Assessment), Section IV.A (BIA), Section VII (Testing), and the post-2024 ransomware emphasis in Section VII.G.
◆ Why now
The 2023 FFIEC BCM Handbook update emphasized testing rigor and ransomware-specific scenarios. The OCC has signaled heightened standards for community banks at $500M+ assets. NYDFS Part 500 expanded incident notification requirements (36-hour rule). Bank partners are requiring detailed BCP documentation from fintech partners as a precondition for renewal. This kit reflects all of it — including 4 worked BIAs by business type and 4 played-out case study walkthroughs (ransomware, AWS regional outage, critical vendor failure, key-person + pandemic).
◆ Where this fits
◆ What this isn't
◆ Effort breakdown
Building a defensible BCP/DR program from scratch typically takes:
| Task a practitioner would do from scratch | Hours |
|---|---|
| Read FFIEC BCM Handbook + relevant OCC/Fed guidance | 20–30 |
| Build BIA template with auto-classification logic | 15–25 |
| Build dependency mapping and recovery procedures structure | 15–25 |
| Draft tabletop exercise scenarios and facilitator guide | 20–30 |
| Develop case-by-case response playbooks for common incidents | 25–40 |
| Total practitioner time | 95–150 hours |
At typical loaded compliance/risk rates ($100–150/hr), that's $9,500–22,500 of internal time. The $79 kit replaces the research and template construction phase, so your team can spend their time populating it for your business — not building it from scratch.
◆ 30-day rollout plan
BCP programs fail when they're built in a vacuum by compliance and never owned by the business. The 30-day rollout below puts business owners at the center.
Use the Tabletop Exercise Kit's BIA Discovery Exercise (5 rounds, 90 minutes) with one leader from each business function. Output: a populated BIA with critical processes, owners, dependencies, and RTOs.
Each function lead maps their process dependencies (systems, vendors, people, upstream/downstream processes) and drafts recovery procedures. Use the worked example matching your business type as a starting point.
Pick the scenario most relevant to your risk profile (ransomware, vendor outage, key-person, pandemic). Run the 90-minute exercise. Use the Case Study Walkthrough as the calibration benchmark for what good looks like.
Capture findings in the action item tracker, update the test log, populate the dashboard, brief the risk committee. Outcome: a defensible BCP your examiner, bank partner, or board can review with confidence.
◆ Full playbook in the PDF guide
Detailed workshop agendas, participant lists, and messaging are in the Tabletop Exercise Kit and Case Study Walkthroughs PDFs you get with the template.
◆ Regulatory alignment
Every section of the kit cites its regulatory source so examiners and bank partners get traceable answers:
Used by compliance and operations teams at fintech lenders, community banks, BaaS providers, and crypto custodians to operationalize their BCP/DR programs.
Last updated: May 1, 2026
◆ Template guide
How to build a business continuity plan template for financial services teams: BIA fields, recovery objectives, dependencies, tabletop tests, and examiner evidence.
◆ FAQ
The BIA template walks you through identifying critical business processes, mapping their dependencies (systems, vendors, staff, data), and assigning RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) targets. The output is a prioritized list of what to recover first in any disruption scenario — the foundation your BCP and DR plan are built on.
Essential (RTO 4–24 hours): processes where disruption within hours causes significant financial or customer harm — payment processing, fraud monitoring, core banking integrations. Important (RTO 24–72 hours): significant but not critical — reporting, compliance functions, secondary customer channels. Deferred (RTO 72+ hours): processes that can wait — analytics, archival functions, back-office administrative tasks.
The 23-page PDF includes: a facilitator guide with step-by-step instructions for running a 90-minute exercise, 5 scenario cards (each is a scenario brief with inject questions — covering ransomware, extended vendor outage, key person departure, natural disaster, and payment rail disruption), a participant worksheet, and a findings capture template with post-exercise action items log. No additional prep required.
Yes. The kit is specifically designed against FFIEC Business Continuity Management (BCM) booklet requirements, including: BIA coverage, plan documentation, testing and exercise requirements, board and senior management oversight, and third-party dependency management. These are the requirements that come up in bank partner due diligence and regulatory exams.
Yes — the tabletop exercise kit is a standalone PDF designed to be used independently. If you need to meet an annual testing requirement and already have a BCP, you can run the tabletop exercise without using any other part of the kit. Many teams use it for their annual FFIEC-required BCP test.
The crisis communication template includes pre-drafted notification templates for 4 audiences: customers (service disruption notice), bank partners (incident notification with RTO estimates), employees (internal emergency communication), and regulators (formal notification). Each template has fill-in-the-blank fields for the specific incident type, impact, and estimated resolution timeline.
Yes. You can use completed outputs with auditors, customers, bank partners, regulators, and internal stakeholders. Customize the template for internal business use — just don't resell or redistribute the source template files.
Checkout is handled through Stripe. After purchase, you receive the template and guide download link immediately on the confirmation page and by email, along with your Stripe receipt. No account is required.
Email within 30 days for a full refund, no questions asked. The guarantee is meant to remove purchase risk while you evaluate whether the template fits your use case.
● First-time buyer offer
Get 20% off your first template.
Drop your email and we'll send the code.
◆ Not ready to buy?
141 pre-populated fintech risks across 21 categories. ISO 31000 structure.
Download free Risk Register →◆ Related templates
Step-by-step incident response playbooks and breach notification templates for all 50 states.
151 controls mapped to AICPA Trust Services Criteria with evidence collection guidance.
Multi-state privacy compliance templates covering 19 state laws plus GLBA and CCPA.
◆ Ready when you are
Start building a defensible risk program today.